The Supreme Court’s tough stand against the Centre for dragging retired armed forces personnel to court over disability pension claims is a stark reminder of the bureaucratic insensitivity that often plagues our systems. The court’s observation that “frivolous appeals” are being filed against disabled veterans highlights a troubling trend: the Government’s apparent reluctance to honour the sacrifices of those who have served the nation. The case in question involved a retired radio fitter who was granted a disability pension by the Armed Forces Tribunal, only to have the Centre challenge the decision in the Supreme Court. This is not an isolated incident. Numerous veterans, many of whom have spent decades in service and sustained disabilities in the line of duty, are forced to endure lengthy legal battles to secure their rightful dues. Such actions not only undermine the morale of the armed forces but also reflect poorly on the Government’s commitment to its veterans.
The Supreme Court rightly questioned the need to drag these individuals to the highest court, especially when the tribunal has already ruled in their favour. The bench emphasised the need for the Centre to exercise discretion and adopt a policy to prevent such unnecessary litigation. The Court’s suggestion that heavy costs could be imposed on frivolous appeals is a welcome step to deter the Government from pursuing such cases. The armed forces are the backbone of the nation’s security, and their welfare should be a top priority. Disability pensions are a recognition of the sacrifices made by soldiers who have suffered injuries while serving the country. By contesting these claims, the Government risks sending a message that their sacrifices are undervalued.
The post Disability Pensions appeared first on Daily Excelsior.