Dr Rakesh Verma
The devastating flash floods that struck Chishoti village in Kishtwar district on August 14, 2025, have ignited a significant scientific debate that extends far beyond determining the immediate cause of this tragedy. While official reports uniformly attributed the disaster to a cloudburst that killed at least 65 people and injured over 115 others during the Machail Mata Yatra pilgrimage, a growing body of scientific evidence suggests the reality may be more complex-and more ominous for the future of Himalayan communities.
The Initial Cloudburst Explanation
Government agencies, disaster response teams, and meteorological authorities immediately classified the Chishoti disaster as a cloudburst-induced flash flood. A cloudburst represents an intense, localized downpour exceeding 100mm of rainfall per hour, typically caused by warm, moist air being forced upward along mountain slopes through orographic lifting. As this air rises to higher altitudes with lower atmospheric pressure, it expands and cools adiabatically, eventually reaching its dew point where water vapor condenses into droplets, forming massive cumulonimbus clouds.
The disaster struck at approximately 12:25 PM on August 14, when hundreds of pilgrims had gathered at Chishoti-the last motorable village on the route to the 9,500-foot-high Machail Mata temple-for lunch at community kitchens. Within minutes, torrential floodwaters swept through the valley, carrying boulders, uprooted trees, and debris that obliterated tents, vehicles, and temporary structures.
The Puzzling Evidence Gap
However, the Chishoti incident presents a troubling scientific puzzle that challenges conventional understanding of cloudbursts. Weather stations in the broader Kishtwar region recorded minimal rainfall-only 5mm according to some reports-on August 14, creating a significant discrepancy between the catastrophic scale of flooding and the limited documented precipitation. This incongruity has prompted disaster specialists and climate researchers to question whether a traditional cloudburst alone could generate such devastating floods.
The absence of substantial rainfall data becomes particularly concerning when considering that Chishoti itself lacks a weather monitoring station, leaving a critical data gap in one of the most disaster-prone areas of the Himalayas. Some experts suggest the downpour might have been extremely localized-too geographically confined to be detected by existing radar and sensor networks while still releasing massive volumes of water in a narrow area.
The GLOF Alternative Hypothesis
An increasingly compelling alternative explanation centers on a Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF), a sudden catastrophic release of water from glacial lakes formed by melting glaciers. These lakes are often held back by fragile natural dams constructed from debris, rock, and ice that can fail due to various triggers including earthquakes, landslides, rapid ice melt, or even relatively modest increases in water pressure.
Recent risk assessments reveal that Kishtwar district hosts 197 glacial lakes-the highest concentration in Jammu and Kashmir, accounting for over one-third of all glacial lakes in the Union Territory. Many of these lakes have expanded significantly in recent decades due to accelerated glacier retreat driven by rising temperatures. The tehsils of Padder, Machail, Dachhan, Marwah, and Warwan are particularly vulnerable to GLOFs due to their proximity to these glacial formations.
Significantly, the Jammu and Kashmir government established a Focused Glacial Lake Outburst Flood Monitoring Committee (FGMC) in April 2024 specifically to address these mounting risks. The committee has identified two high-risk lakes-Mundiksar and Hangu-and two moderate-risk lakes in the Kishtwar region. Field expeditions conducted by the committee to study these critical glacial lakes have provided valuable data on lake conditions and potential GLOF risks.
Scientific Complexity and Detection Challenges
The debate over Chishoti’s cause highlights the scientific complexity of distinguishing between cloudbursts and GLOFs, particularly in remote Himalayan regions where monitoring infrastructure remains limited. Both phenomena can produce similar downstream effects: sudden, high-energy floods carrying massive amounts of debris and sediment. However, their underlying mechanisms and implications for future risk management differ substantially.
A 2023 study of the South Lhonak GLOF in Sikkim demonstrates how these events can involve cascading processes. In that case, a sudden cloudburst triggered an ice avalanche that crashed into a glacial lake, creating waves that overtopped the natural dam and ultimately breached the terminal moraine, releasing devastating floods downstream. This example illustrates how cloudbursts and GLOFs can interact, making precise cause determination challenging without comprehensive monitoring systems.
The challenge of accurate GLOF detection is further complicated by the remote, high-altitude locations of most glacial lakes, where cloud cover, ice formation, and extreme weather conditions can obscure satellite observations for extended periods. Researchers analyzing global GLOF patterns have found that 27% of previously reported GLOFs could not be verified through satellite imagery due to these detection limitations.
Climate Change as the Underlying Driver
Regardless of the specific trigger mechanism at Chishoti, both cloudbursts and GLOFs are becoming more frequent and severe due to climate change impacts on the Himalayan region. The Himalayas are warming at nearly twice the global average rate, fundamentally destabilizing the region’s glacial and hydrological systems. This warming trend is causing glaciers to retreat at unprecedented rates-the Kolahoi glacier, for example, has lost almost 23% of its mass since 1962.
Climate change affects both phenomena through multiple pathways. For every degree of temperature increase, the atmosphere can hold approximately 7% more moisture, potentially intensifying cloudburst events. Simultaneously, accelerating glacial melt creates larger and more numerous glacial lakes that are increasingly prone to outburst floods.
Western Disturbances, weather systems that traditionally brought winter moisture to the region, are now occurring in unusual seasons and carrying more moisture from the warming Arabian Sea. This changing precipitation pattern, combined with shortened winters and reduced snowfall, creates conditions conducive to both extreme rainfall events and rapid glacial lake formation.
Infrastructure Vulnerabilities and Risk Assessment
The ongoing scientific debate has significant implications for infrastructure development and disaster preparedness in the region. A comprehensive risk assessment for Kishtwar district warns that major hydroelectric projects under Chenab Valley Power Projects Limited, including Pakal Dul, Kiru, Kwar, and Dangduru, face high vulnerability to both cloudbursts and GLOF events. Rising water levels or dam breaches could severely damage project infrastructure, disrupt operations, and increase downstream flood risks.
Critical transportation networks are equally vulnerable. GLOFs or major cloudbursts could wash away key access routes, making transportation and evacuation impossible during emergencies. This isolation of mountain communities during crises would significantly hamper relief and rescue operations, as witnessed during the Chishoti disaster where difficult terrain and damaged infrastructure complicated rescue efforts.
Early Warning System Inadequacies
The Chishoti tragedy has exposed significant gaps in the region’s disaster monitoring and early warning capabilities. Currently, only three Doppler radars-located in Srinagar, Jammu, and Banihal-track weather patterns and potential extremes across Jammu and Kashmir. This sparse network leaves vast areas of the mountainous terrain without adequate coverage, particularly in high-altitude regions where both cloudbursts and GLOFs pose the greatest risks.
Meteorological officials acknowledge that intense showers and flash floods are becoming increasingly common phenomena. However, the region lacks sufficient early warning systems capable of detecting and differentiating between various types of flood hazards. The absence of real-time monitoring at glacial lakes and limited weather stations in critical watersheds create dangerous blind spots in hazard detection.
Effective early warning systems for Himalayan regions require integration of multiple monitoring components including glacial lake surveillance, meteorological monitoring, seismic detection, and downstream river monitoring. The Cirenmaco early warning system in the central Himalayas serves as a model for such comprehensive approaches, utilizing satellite data transmission and real-time monitoring to provide advance warning of potential GLOFs.
Implications for Future Disaster Management
The scientific uncertainty surrounding the Chishoti disaster underscores the urgent need for enhanced monitoring and risk assessment capabilities throughout the Himalayas. Whether the specific cause was a cloudburst, GLOF, or a combination of factors, the tragedy demonstrates how climate change is amplifying existing vulnerabilities in mountain communities.
The government’s GLOF mitigation strategy involves a phased implementation approach including expedition-based data collection, risk categorization of glacial lakes, and establishment of early warning systems. However, the scope and speed of implementation may not match the accelerating pace of climate-related risks in the region.
Beyond technical solutions, the debate highlights the need for integrated disaster management approaches that address both immediate hazards and underlying vulnerability factors. This includes regulating development in high-risk areas, improving evacuation procedures for pilgrimage routes, and building community resilience through education and preparedness training.
Conclusion: A Wake-Up Call for Himalayan Preparedness
The ongoing scientific debate over whether the Chishoti disaster resulted from a cloudburst or GLOF reflects broader challenges in understanding and managing climate-related risks in the Himalayas. While researchers continue investigating the specific mechanisms that triggered the tragedy, the fundamental reality remains clear: both phenomena pose escalating threats to Himalayan communities under current climate change trajectories.
The disaster serves as a stark reminder that traditional disaster management approaches may prove inadequate for addressing the complex, interconnected hazards emerging in a rapidly changing climate. Whether originating from atmospheric or glacial processes, the devastating floods at Chishoti demonstrate how climate change is transforming familiar risks into unprecedented threats that require equally unprecedented responses in monitoring, preparation, and community resilience.
As the Himalayas continue warming at accelerating rates, the distinction between cloudburst and GLOF risks may become less important than developing comprehensive strategies that can address both phenomena simultaneously. The tragedy at Chishoti should catalyze immediate action to strengthen monitoring networks, improve early warning systems, and build adaptive capacity in mountain communities before the next disaster strikes-regardless of its specific scientific classification.
(The author is from J&K Forest Services)
The post Chishoti Floods generate Cloudburst Vs GLOF debate appeared first on Daily Excelsior.