The Government of Jammu & Kashmir’s decision to designate 20 District and Sessions Courts as Special Courts for the speedy trial of illegal mining offences marks a watershed moment in the Union Territory’s battle against a parallel extractive economy that has long evaded meaningful accountability. While administrative assertions of “zero tolerance” have been frequent and sometimes well-intentioned, the on-ground reality tells a different story-one where illegal mining continues to flourish, siphoning natural resources, damaging river ecosystems and bridges, and eroding public trust in governance. In this context, fast-track judicial intervention is not merely desirable but indispensable.
For years, illegal mining has thrived on a dangerous combination of high demand, institutional gaps, and slow judicial processes. Despite intensified vigilance by district administrations, frequent seizures of vehicles, and a spate of FIRs, the true deterrence has been missing. The reason is simple: no illegal activity collapses unless convictions outpace violations, and in J&K, court cases related to illegal mining have dragged on for years. Pendency has grown into a shield that emboldens violators, giving them the confidence that even if their machinery is seized or FIRs registered, the legal consequences will either take too long or never materialise.
It is also important to acknowledge that the administrative machinery has not been entirely inactive. Several districts have routinely seized vehicles, imposed penalties, and filed dozens of cases. Social media is replete with videos uploaded by vigilant citizens who record illegal extraction-especially near bridges, riverbeds where mining is banned, and areas where permissions have lapsed. These videos have often forced authorities to take action. Yet the absence of concluding judgments has meant that violators often manage to retrieve their vehicles, resume operations, and even intimidate whistleblowers.
This structural gap between administrative action and judicial finality has long undermined the very purpose of the stringent provisions available under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The law is clear, uncompromising and loaded with punitive potential-ranging from imprisonment to hefty fines and even cancellation of vehicle registration certificates for repeated offenders. However, these legal teeth are effective only when courts issue timely verdicts. Without concluding trials, seizures remain symbolic, FIRs become mere paperwork, and illegal mining networks continue to operate with brazen impunity.
The Government’s move, therefore, fills a long-standing void. This is not a routine administrative decision; it is a systemic correction that could redefine how the mining laws are enforced in J&K. The emphasis on speed is crucial. Years-long trials have been the Achilles’ heel of anti-mining enforcement. When violators know that a case may take half a decade to reach the final stage, the fear of consequences naturally diminishes. Special Courts, on the other hand, will compress timelines drastically-turning years into months and inertia into momentum. Once judgments start flowing consistently, the quantum of punishment, especially in repeat offences, will serve as a powerful deterrent. After all, courts serve as the final arbiters of accountability, and only their timely verdicts can dismantle illegal networks. Speedy judicial action changes the equation. It empowers police and district administration, giving meaning to their enforcement efforts. It signals to violators that impunity is no longer guaranteed. It lends credibility to the Government’s claim of zero tolerance. And most importantly, it restores public faith that the law is not merely a text but an active instrument of justice.
Illegal mining is not a small infraction; it is a direct attack on environmental health, infrastructure safety, and public revenue. It weakens bridges, destroys river morphology, undermines flood protection systems and creates a shadow economy that competes with legitimate mining operations that pay royalty and taxes and abide by environmental guidelines. The designation of Special Courts is thus more than administrative reform; it is a strategic intervention. The coming months will reveal how effectively these courts function, how swiftly they clear backlogs, and how strongly their verdicts reshape J&K’s mining landscape. One thing is certain: a major hurdle has finally been removed. The tools of justice are now sharper, faster and better positioned to strike at the roots of illegal mining.
The post Special Courts for Illegal Mining appeared first on Daily Excelsior.