The possible resumption of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra after a four-year hiatus marks a significant step in the ongoing recalibration of India-China relations. More than just a pilgrimage route reopening, the development signals a subtle yet meaningful thaw in the diplomatic freeze that followed the deadly Galwan Valley clashes of 2020. As both nations navigate the turbulent waters of geopolitics and border tensions, this renewed engagement-backed by diplomatic dialogues and people-to-people initiatives-may serve as a harbinger of cautious optimism.
The Kailash Mansarovar Yatra is not merely a religious or spiritual journey; it is deeply enshrined in India’s cultural and civilisational ethos. Every year, pilgrims undertake the arduous trek to the sacred mountain and lake. Hindus and many other followers revere the journey. Therefore, its resumption carries emotional significance for many Indian citizens. However, it is equally important to recognise the broader geopolitical implications that underlie this development. Following the 2020 Galwan Valley incident, which resulted in the deaths of soldiers on both sides, India-China relations plummeted to a historic low. Trade continued, but political and people-to-people engagement were severely curtailed. The Kailash Mansarovar Yatra was suspended, and direct flights between the two countries were halted. In this context, the resumption of the Yatra and talks of restoring flight services signify a tentative détente-perhaps the beginning of a new phase characterised by cautious engagement.
The diplomatic momentum that led to this announcement has been steadily building over the past year. Key milestones include the disengagement at the remaining friction points of Depsang and Demchok and high-level diplomatic visits such as NSA Ajit Doval’s trip to Beijing in December and Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri’s visit in January. These were complemented by structured dialogues under the Special Representatives framework and other official mechanisms. Importantly, the Modi-Xi meeting in Kazan last October appears to have laid the groundwork for this renewed effort at normalisation.
Yet, this revival is not merely about repairing ties; it is also about managing strategic competition. Both countries recognise that sustained hostility serves neither’s long-term interest, particularly as they grapple with internal economic challenges and shifting global alliances. For China, stabilising relations with India could help mitigate regional tensions and focus attention on its faltering economy and the Taiwan Strait. For India, maintaining peace along LAC allows it to concentrate on domestic development and strategic partnerships, especially with Western democracies.
Still, it would be naive to view these developments as a return to pre-2020 normalcy. The mistrust generated by the Galwan incident and the broader military standoff cannot be easily erased. While disengagement has occurred in some areas, the situation in eastern Ladakh remains fragile, with both sides maintaining substantial troop deployments. Thus, the resumption of the Yatra should be seen as a confidence-building measure, not a comprehensive resolution.
Equally important is the emphasis on people-to-people exchanges, including direct flights and cultural dialogues. These softer aspects of diplomacy are essential to building long-term trust and mutual understanding. They act as societal stabilisers that can cushion political shocks and prevent complete breakdowns in communication, as seen during the peak of the LAC crisis. But the real test lies in how both countries leverage this window of opportunity. Further, engagement through other stalled mechanisms like the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination is important. Tangible progress on the boundary issue has to be achieved instead of remaining trapped in tactical manoeuvring.
India has to tread carefully. Engagement should not translate into appeasement, and CBMs should not come at the cost of core strategic interests. Simultaneously, rejecting all overtures in favour of a hardline stance may lead to prolonged instability. A calibrated approach-assertive yet open to dialogue-appears to be the most prudent path forward. Whether this signals a broader thaw or merely a temporary respite remains to be seen. But for now, the Himalayas may once again echo with chants of devotion, offering peace in a region marked by tension.
The post Resumption of Kailash Mansarovar Yatra appeared first on Daily Excelsior.