The UT of Ladakh, carved out of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019, was initially welcomed with jubilation. Ladakhis had long aspired for a separate administrative identity, free from what they perceived as decades of discrimination under Kashmir’s dominance. However, just five years into its existence as a UT, discontent is visible. Clashes, shutdowns, and hunger strikes reflect the resentment of the people who feel their aspirations remain unaddressed. The urgent need today is to restore normalcy through dialogue, empathy, and a balanced approach to power-sharing.
At the heart of Ladakh’s unrest lies the issue of governance. Since 2019, three Lieutenant Governors have been appointed to channelize talks and move forward. The absence of political representation has left Ladakhis without an effective voice in decision-making. Both Leh and Kargil, despite their historical differences over alliance with Kashmir, now stand united under the Leh Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance, demanding statehood and inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. Their unity across religious lines signals the seriousness of the crisis: the people want not just development but dignity and self-representation. With nearly 97 percent of Ladakh’s population being tribal, there is anxiety about cultural erosion and demographic change. The massive influx of tourists, which already outnumbers the local population, heightens fears of an eventual demographic imbalance. Similarly, apprehensions about outsiders purchasing land or controlling local resources are deeply felt. For a fragile ecological zone already facing the pressures of climate change, mining projects, mega solar plants, and rapid infrastructure expansion appear threatening when local communities are excluded from the planning process.
On the other hand, the Government has its own compulsions. Ladakh’s strategic location, bordering China and Pakistan, leaves little room for political experimentation. The Galwan clashes of 2020 and earlier confrontations in Siachen highlight the region’s critical military importance. For New Delhi, large-scale investments in renewable energy, mineral exploration, and infrastructure are considered pathways to economic growth and national security. The Centre is unwilling to reverse its 2019 decision by conceding statehood in such a short span, fearing it would weaken the broader case for constitutional changes made in Jammu and Kashmir.
This deadlock-where Ladakhis want greater autonomy and the Government prioritises control-has created an environment of mistrust. The violent protests, including the torching of a security vehicle, only deepen the divide. Violence, however, is neither sustainable nor desirable in a democracy. The spirit of voluntarism and loyalty shown by Ladakhis during the Kargil war and other national crises must not be diluted.
The path forward lies in mutual accommodation. While the Centre may not be in a position to grant full statehood immediately, it must acknowledge the genuine concerns of Ladakhis. Strengthening the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils in Leh and Kargil with enhanced legislative and financial powers would be a meaningful first step. Appointing local representatives as advisors to the LG could ensure that community voices are not sidelined. Simultaneously, transparent mechanisms for land, job reservations, and environmental safeguards can reassure residents about their future. Equally, Ladakhi leaders must calibrate their demands pragmatically. Expecting full statehood in the immediate term may be unrealistic, but pressing for concrete, time-bound devolution of powers is achievable. The unity between Leh and Kargil should not be squandered on absolutist positions but channelled into constructive negotiation. In a democratic setup, trust is built not through confrontation but through credible compromises.
Ladakh is not just another region; it is a symbol of India’s cultural diversity and a frontline of national security. Prolonged unrest can create opportunities for external adversaries to exploit internal divisions. Sensing the situation, Sonam Wangchuk has called off the hunger strikes. Creating a peaceful atmosphere for talks is the priority. What is required is a time-bound roadmap agreed upon by the Government and Ladakhi representatives. Some demands may have to be dropped, others accommodated, but the process must be transparent, inclusive, and sensitive to local aspirations. If the Government and the people of Ladakh come to the table with open minds, democracy will find a way.
The post Restore Normalcy in Ladakh appeared first on Daily Excelsior.