Rakesh Koul
In a diverse and democratic nation like India, respect for national symbols is not merely a formality—it is a reflection of our commitment to unity and the constitutional values that bind us together. Unfortunately, certain public representatives continue to create unnecessary controversies around “Vande Mataram,” our national song, despite its deep historical and cultural significance.
It is important to remind such leaders and individuals that if Sher-e-Kashmir Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah is respected as the Father of Jammu & Kashmir and if his legacy is honoured, then there should be no contradiction in paying respect to the Mother of the Nation through the singing of “Vande Mataram.” Selective reverence cannot be the basis of political convenience.
Oath of the Constitution Means Respect for National Symbols
Every Member of Parliament, MLA, or public representative — regardless of religion, region, or ideology — takes an oath to uphold the Constitution of India. This Constitution is supreme.
If they accept its authority, then what objection can there be in singing the national song which embodies the spirit of our freedom struggle and national unity?
Respecting the national song is not about religion. It is about national duty.
No Space for Double Standards
If any elected representative chooses to place personal or religious sentiments above constitutional responsibilities, then it raises a serious question:
Do they deserve to represent the people of India?
A leader who refuses to honour national symbols cannot claim loyalty to the democratic process. Such individuals should introspect whether they have the moral or constitutional right to sit in Parliament or the Legislative Assembly.
Public representatives who enjoy all democratic privileges but refuse to uphold national unity are violating the very spirit of public service.
India First — Always
India is a land of diverse cultures and beliefs, but national identity must remain paramount.
No religion teaches disrespect towards the nation. No faith opposes paying respect to the Motherland.
Those who deliberately create controversies for political gain only weaken social harmony.
A Call for Accountability
I strongly believe that appropriate action must be taken against any representative who refuses to honour national symbols and thereby undermines the Constitution. Such behaviour is not freedom of expression—it is a breach of constitutional responsibility.
The message is simple:
One cannot enjoy the fruits of democracy while disrespecting its roots.
By Rakesh Koul (Brah), Social Activist & Senior Journalist
The post National Integrity Above All: Why the National Song Should Not Be Controversial appeared first on Daily Excelsior.